Helmholtz Gemeinschaft

Search
Browse
Statistics
Feeds

Evaluating the impact of genetic and epigenetic aberrations on survival and response in acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving epigenetic therapy

Item Type:Article
Title:Evaluating the impact of genetic and epigenetic aberrations on survival and response in acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving epigenetic therapy
Creators Name:Hiller, J.K., Schmoor, C., Gaidzik, V.I., Schmidt-Salzmann, C., Yalcin, A., Abdelkarim, M., Blagitko-Dorfs, N., Döhner, K., Bullinger, L., Duyster, J., Lübbert, M. and Hackanson, B.
Abstract:Treatment with hypomethylating agents such as decitabine, which results in overall response rates of up to 50%, has become standard of care in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy. However, there still exists a lack of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers that enable selection of patients who are likely to benefit from epigenetic therapy. Here, we investigated distinct genetic (FLT3-ITD, NPM1, DNMT3A) and epigenetic (estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), C/EBPα, and OLIG2) aberrations in 87 AML patients from the recently published phase II decitabine trial (AML00331) to identify potential biomarkers for patients receiving hypomethylating therapy. While FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutational status were not associated with survival or response to therapy, patients harboring DNMT3A R882 mutations showed a non-significant association towards shorter overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 2.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-5.12, p = 0.08). Promoter DNA methylation analyses using pyrosequencing also revealed a non-significant association towards shorter overall survival of patients with higher levels of methylation of ERα (HR 1.50, CI 0.97-2.32, p = 0.07) and OLIG2 CpG4 (HR 1.52, CI 0.96-2.41, p = 0.08), while DNA methylation of C/EBPα showed no association with outcome. Importantly, in multivariate analyses adjusted for clinical baseline parameters, the impact of ERα and OLIG2 CpG4 methylation was conserved (HR 1.76, CI 1.01-3.06, p = 0.05 and HR 1.67, CI 0.91-3.08, p = 0.10, respectively). In contrast, none of the investigated genetic and epigenetic markers was associated with response to treatment. Additional to the previously reported adverse prognostic clinical parameters such as patients' age, reduced performance status, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, DNMT3A R882 mutation status, as well as ERα and OLIG2 CpG4 DNA methylation status, may prove to be molecular markers in older AML patients prior to hypomethylating therapy.
Keywords:AML, Decitabine, Epigenetics, Biomarker
Source:Annals of Hematology
ISSN:0939-5555
Publisher:Springer
Volume:96
Number:4
Page Range:559-565
Date:April 2017
Official Publication:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-016-2912-7
PubMed:View item in PubMed

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Open Access
MDC Library