Helmholtz Gemeinschaft

Search
Browse
Statistics
Feeds

An individual patient-data comparison of combined modality therapy and ABVD alone for patients with limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma

Item Type:Article
Title:An individual patient-data comparison of combined modality therapy and ABVD alone for patients with limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma
Creators Name:Hay, A.E., Klimm, B., Chen, B.E., Goergen, H., Shepherd, L.E., Fuchs, M., Gospodarowicz, M.K., Borchmann, P., Connors, J.M., Markova, J., Crump, M., Lohri, A., Winter, J.N., Doerken, B., Pearcey, R.G., Diehl, V., Horning, S.J., Eich, H.T., Engert, A. and Meyer, R.M.
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with nonbulky stage IA-IIA Hodgkin lymphoma include combined modality therapy (CMT) using doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) plus involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT), and chemotherapy with ABVD alone. There are no mature randomized data comparing ABVD with CMT using modern radiation techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using German Hodgkin Study Group HD10/HD11 and NCIC Clinical Trials Group HD.6 databases, we identified 588 patients who met mutually inclusive eligibility criteria from the preferred arms of HD10 or 11 (n = 406) and HD.6 (n = 182). We evaluated time to progression (TTP), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival, including in three predefined exploratory subset analyses. RESULTS: With median follow-up of 91 (HD10/11) and 134 (HD.6) months, respective 8-year outcomes were for TTP, 93% versus 87% [hazard ratio (HR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-0.78]; for PFS, 89% versus 86% (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.42-1.18) and for overall survival, 95% versus 95% (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.49-2.40). In the exploratory subset analysis including HD10 eligible patients who achieved complete response (CR) or unconfirmed complete response (CRu) after two cycles of ABVD, 8-year PFS was 87% (HD10) versus 95% (HD.6) (HR 2.8; 95% CI 0.64-12.5) and overall survival 96% versus 100%. In contrast, among those without CR/CRu after two cycles of ABVD, 8-year PFS was 88% versus 74% (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.16-0.79) and overall survival 95% versus 91%, respectively (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.12-1.44). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with nonbulky stage IA-IIA Hodgkin lymphoma, CMT provides better disease control than ABVD alone, especially among those not achieving complete response after two cycles of ABVD. Within the follow-up duration evaluated, overall survivals were similar. Longer follow-up is required to understand the implications of radiation and chemotherapy-related late effects. CLINICAL TRIALS: The trials included in this analysis were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: HD10 - NCT00265018, HD11 - NCT00264953, HD.6 - NCT00002561.
Keywords:Hodgkin Lymphoma, Chemotherapy, Combined Modality Therapy, Radiation Therapy, Progression-Free Survival, Clinical Trial
Source:Annals of Oncology
ISSN:0923-7534
Publisher:Oxford University Press
Volume:24
Number:12
Page Range:3065-3069
Date:December 2013
Official Publication:https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt389
PubMed:View item in PubMed

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Open Access
MDC Library