Search
Browse
Statistics
Feeds

Identification of prognostic biomarkers in a large cohort of patients with LGMD R2

[thumbnail of Original Article]
Preview
PDF (Original Article) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
1MB
[thumbnail of Supplementary Information]
Preview
PDF (Supplementary Information) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
283kB

Item Type:Article
Title:Identification of prognostic biomarkers in a large cohort of patients with LGMD R2
Creators Name:Bolano-Diaz, Carla F., Verdu-Diaz, Jose, Hao, Dan, James, Meredith K., Rufibach, Laura, Blamire, Andrew, Reyngoudt, Harmen, Carlier, Pierre G., Gordish-Dressman, Heather, Hilsden, Heather, Spuler, Simone, Day, John, Jones, Kristi J., Bharucha-Goebel, Diana, Pestronk, Alan, Walter, Maggie C., Paradas, Carmen, Stojkovic, Tanya, Mori-Yoshimura, Madoka, Bravver, Elena, Pegoraro, Elena, Mendell, Jerry, Straub, Volker and Diaz-Manera, Jordi
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy R2-dysferlin related (LGMD-R2) is a progressive muscle condition with marked variability in disease course, making prognosis challenging. Quantitative MRI (qMRI) has emerged as a complementary tool that may detect progression earlier and more precisely. Integrating different data modalities is challenging with conventional approaches, and artificial intelligence (AI) can help overcome this. Our aim is to develop robust models capable of predicting clinical progression in LGMD-R2 by incorporating AI-based techniques into the analysis pipeline. METHODS: Data from 188 COS 1 participants were analysed. Disease progression was assessed using the North Star Assessment for Limb Girdle type Muscular Dystrophies (NSAD). Ambulatory individuals with a maximum NSAD ≥ 20 were included, and progression trajectories were identified through hierarchical clustering. Feature selection was performed using a machine learning pipeline, and top predictors were entered into stepwise logistic regression to build clinical-only and combined clinical-MRI models. RESULTS: Two stages of progression were identified, a fast one with a mean three-year loss of 14.4 NSAD points, and a moderate one, with a mean loss of 3.8 NSAD points. The combined model achieved better balanced accuracy than the clinical-only one (83.7% vs 78.7%). Key predictors in the combined model were disease duration and fat content measures in the anterior thigh and gracilis muscle, while the clinical model included disease duration, creatine phosphokinase (CK), and 10 m walk/run test velocity. CONCLUSIONS: Progression in LGMD-R2 can be grouped into distinct clinical trajectories. Individuals at a faster stage of progression were younger, had shorter disease duration, higher CK, greater weakness, and relatively preserved vastus intermedius and gracilis muscles. AI enabled efficient integration of heterogeneous data, and qMRI biomarkers provided complementary information that improved predictive accuracy.
Keywords:Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophies, Dysferlin, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Disease Progression, Prognosis, Biomarkers
Source:Journal of Neurology
ISSN:0340-5354
Publisher:Springer
Volume:273
Number:6
Page Range:344
Date:26 May 2026
Official Publication:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-026-13868-0
PubMed:View item in PubMed

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Open Access
MDC Library