Search
Browse
Statistics
Feeds

Deep learning-based generation of synthetic multiphasic MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis

[thumbnail of Original Article]
Preview
PDF (Original Article) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
6MB
[thumbnail of Supplementary Data] Other (Supplementary Data)
17MB

Item Type:Article
Title:Deep learning-based generation of synthetic multiphasic MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis
Creators: Abosabie, Sara A., Abosabie, Salma A.S., Dai, Weicheng, Yang, Junlin, Gross, Moritz, Weinreb, Jeffrey, Revzin, Margarita V., Parmar, Gaurav, You, Chenyu, Lin, MingDe, Gaddum, Olivia, Gebauer, Bernhard, Savic, Lynn Jeanette ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2115-6728, Madoff, David Craig, Duncan, James S. and Chapiro, Julius
Abstract:BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is growing interest in reducing contrast medium use and the lengthy scan duration in liver imaging. This proof of concept study evaluated the feasibility of deep learning-based generation of synthetic 3D liver contrast-enhanced multiphasic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams, which are similar to ground-truth exams in hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis. METHODS: MRI exams from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or cirrhosis at a single academic center were retrospectively collected. A 3D cycle-consistent generative adversarial network was trained to generate synthetic 3D T1-weighted contrast-enhanced multiphasic liver MRI exams, including arterial, portal venous, delayed, and hepatobiliary phases, using two pre-contrast T1-weighted and T2-weighted input phases. Quantitative performance evaluated similarity, error, and overlap metrics between synthetic and ground-truth exams. For the qualitative multireader study, three blinded radiologists assessed the ground-truth and synthetic MRI exams using a comprehensive questionnaire. Questionnaire tasks 1–5 comprised: visual Turing test (ground-truth vs. synthetic nature), image quality, anatomic accuracy, disease diagnosability, and artifacts. Task 6 comprised Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System features. RESULTS: The study included 3,198 MRI phases from 533 MRI exams from 185 patients with HCC (mean age, 62.1 years ± 9.7 [SD]; 141 men) and 182 patients with cirrhosis (54.4 years ± 10.0; 111 men). Synthetic MRI exams achieved high quantitative and qualitative similarity to ground-truth exams. Quantitative analysis demonstrated high structural similarity index (0.86 ± 0.03), overlap (0.97 ± 0.05), and low symmetric mean absolute percent error (0.63 ± 0.23%). The qualitative multireader study showed no significant difference in tasks 1–5 (p = 0.06–0.50) and high performance metrics in task 6 (accuracy: 0.76–0.86; precision: 0.96–1.00) with moderate to perfect Fleiss’s Kappa inter-rater agreement (0.58–1.00, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning enabled the generation of synthetic 3D liver contrast-enhanced multiphasic MRI exams from precontrast sequences, achieving high quantitative and qualitative similarity to ground-truth images.
Keywords:Deep Learning, Generative Adversarial Networks, Synthetic 3D Contrast-Enhanced Liver MRI, Contrastenhanced Multiphasic Liver MRI, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Cirrhosis
Source:JHEP Reports
ISSN:2589-5559
Publisher:Elsevier / European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL)
Volume:8
Number:7
Page Range:101813
Date:July 2026
Official Publication:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101813
PubMed:View item in PubMed

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Open Access
MDC Library