Helmholtz Gemeinschaft

Search
Browse
Statistics
Feeds

Diagnostic yield of various genetic approaches in patients with unexplained developmental delay or mental retardation

Item Type:Article
Title:Diagnostic yield of various genetic approaches in patients with unexplained developmental delay or mental retardation
Creators Name:Rauch, A. and Hoyer, J. and Guth, S. and Zweier, C. and Kraus, C. and Becker, C. and Zenker, M. and Hueffmeier, U. and Thiel, C. and Rueschendorf, F. and Nuernberg, P. and Reis, A. and Trautmann, U.
Abstract:The underlying cause of mental retardation remains unknown in up to 80% of patients. As chromosomal aberrations are the most common known cause of mental retardation, several new methods based on FISH, PCR, and array techniques have been developed over recent years to increase detection rate of subtle aneusomies initially of the gene rich subtelomeric regions, but nowadays also genome wide. As the reported detection rates vary widely between different reports and in order to compare the diagnostic yield of various investigations, we analyzed the diagnostic yield of conventional karyotyping, subtelomeric screening, molecular karyotyping, X-inactivation studies, and dysmorphological evaluation with targeted laboratory testing in unselected patients referred for developmental delay or mental retardation to our cytogenetic laboratory (n = 600) and to our genetic clinic (n = 570). In the cytogenetic group, 15% of patients showed a disease-related aberration, while various targeted analyses after dysmorphological investigation led to a diagnosis in about 20% in the genetic clinic group. When adding the patients with a cytogenetic aberration to the patient group seen in genetic clinic, an etiological diagnosis was established in about 40% of the combined study group. A conventional cytogenetic diagnosis was present in 16% of combined patients and a microdeletion syndrome was diagnosed in 5.3%, while subtelomeric screening revealed only 1.3% of causes. Molecular karyotyping with a 10 K SNP array in addition revealed 5% of underlying causes, but 29% of all diagnoses would have been detectable by molecular karyotyping. In those patients without a clear diagnosis, 5.6% of mothers of affected boys showed significant (>95%) skewing of X-inactivation suggesting X-linked mental retardation. The most common diagnoses with a frequency of more than 0.5% were Down syndrome (9.2%), common microdeletion 22q11.2 (2.4%), Williams-Beuren syndrome (1.3%), Fragile-X syndrome (1.2%), Cohen syndrome (0.7%), and monosomy 1p36.3 (0.6%). From our data, we suggest the following diagnostic procedure in patients with unexplained developmental delay or mental retardation: (1) Clinical/dysmorphological investigation with respective targeted analyses; (2) In the remaining patients without an etiological diagnosis, we suggest conventional karyotyping, X-inactivation screening in mothers of boys, and molecular karyotyping, if available. If molecular karyotyping is not available, subtelomeric screening should be performed.
Keywords:Mental retardation, Diagnostic yield, Cytogenetics, Subtelomeric screening, Molecular karyotyping, 10 K GeneChip Array, X-inactivation, XLMR, Cohen syndrome, Microdeletion syndromes, 22q11 deletion, Williams syndrome, Monosomy 1p36.3, Fragile-X syndrome, Down syndrome
Source:American Journal of Medical Genetics A
ISSN:1552-4825
Publisher:John Wiley & Sons (U.K.)
Volume:140A
Number:19
Page Range:2063-2074
Date:1 October 2006
Official Publication:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.31416
PubMed:View item in PubMed

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Open Access
MDC Library