Midterm follow-up of patients who underwent removal of a left ventricular assist device after cardiac recovery from end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy

Item Type:	Article
Title:	Midterm follow-up of patients who underwent removal of a left ventricular assist device after cardiac recovery from end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy
Creators Name:	Hetzer, R. and Mueller, J.H. and Weng, Y.G. and Loebe, M. and Wallukat, G.
Abstract:	Objective: Cardiac recovery in end-stage idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy recently occurred after temporary support with a left ventricular assist device. We report the case histories of patients who underwent removal of the device more than 4 years ago. Methods: Since June 1994, 23 patients with end-stage idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy who were supported by a left ventricular assist device or biventricular assist device for 1 to 26 months (mean, 6 months) underwent removal of the device after complete or extensive cardiac recovery, as revealed by echocardiography. Results: Seven patients (group A) had recurrent cardiac failure after 4 to 24 months. Transplantation was performed in 6 patients, and one died while on the waiting list. Three patients died of noncardiac causes within a period of 4 months and 3 days after removal of the assist device. Stable cardiac recovery occurred in 13 patients (group B) for 3 to 49 months (mean, 23 months). At the time of implantation, there were no significant differences between the groups with regard to age, hemodynamics, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular internal diameter in diastole, and autoantibody levels. The increase of ejection fraction and the decrease of left ventricular internal diameter in diastole after 2 months were highly significant. The patients in group A had longer histories of heart failure and first cardiac symptoms and duration of assist when compared with group B. Group B demonstrated a quicker cardiac recovery on the assist device, and thus support was shorter. Also, the degree of recovery at assist device explantation was more complete in group B. The age at the time of device placement was the only influencing factor for duration on the assist device. The probability of recurrence of heart failure was influenced by the duration of heart failure. Conclusions: In selected patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, lasting recovery can be achieved after unloading with a left ventricular assist device. Lasting cardiac recovery seems to be related to functional normalization and a more rapid recovery during the unloading period.
Keywords:	Analysis of Variance, Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Follow-Up Studies, Heart-Assist Devices, Left Ventricular Dysfunction, Nonparametric Statistics, Proportional Hazards Models, Stroke Volume, Survival Rate, Transesophageal Echocardiography, Treatment Outcome
Source:	Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
ISSN:	0022-5223
Publisher:	Elsevier / Mosby
Volume:	120
Number:	5
Page Range:	843-853
Date:	November 2000
Official Publication:	https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2000.108931
PubMed:	View item in PubMed

Repository Staff Only: item control page