Helmholtz Gemeinschaft

Search
Browse
Statistics
Feeds

Changes of aortic hemodynamics after aortic valve replacement - a four dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance follow up study

[img]
Preview
PDF (Original Article) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
2MB
[img] Other (Supplementary Material)
8MB

Item Type:Article
Title:Changes of aortic hemodynamics after aortic valve replacement - a four dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance follow up study
Creators Name:Wiesemann, S. and Trauzeddel, R.F. and Musa, A. and Hickstein, R. and Mayr, T. and von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, F. and Bollache, E. and Markl, M. and Schulz-Menger, J.
Abstract:OBJECTIVES: Non-invasive assessment of aortic hemodynamics using four dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides new information on blood flow patterns and wall shear stress (WSS). Aortic valve stenosis (AS) and/or bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) are associated with altered aortic flow patterns and elevated WSS. Aim of this study was to investigate changes in aortic hemodynamics over time in patients with AS and/or BAV with or without aortic valve replacement. METHODS: We rescheduled 20 patients for a second 4D flow MRI examination, whose first examination was at least 3 years prior. A total of 7 patients received an aortic valve replacement between baseline and follow up examination (=operated group = OP group). Aortic flow patterns (helicity/vorticity) were assessed using a semi-quantitative grading approach from 0 to 3, flow volumes were evaluated in 9 planes, WSS in 18 and peak velocity in 3 areas. RESULTS: While most patients had vortical and/or helical flow formations within the aorta, there was no significant change over time. Ascending aortic forward flow volumes were significantly lower in the OP group than in the NOP group at baseline (NOP 69.3 mL ± 14.2 mL vs. OP 55.3 mL ± 1.9 mL p = 0.029). WSS in the outer ascending aorta was significantly higher in the OP group than in the NOP group at baseline (NOP 0.6 ± 0.2 N/m(2) vs. OP 0.8 ± 0.2 N/m(2), p = 0.008). Peak velocity decreased from baseline to follow up in the aortic arch only in the OP group (1.6 ± 0.6 m/s vs. 1.2 ± 0.3 m/s,  = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Aortic valve replacement influences aortic hemodynamics. The parameters improve after surgery.
Keywords:Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 4D Flow, Aorta, Aortic Stenosis, Bicuspid Aortic Valve, Aortic Valve Replacement
Source:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
ISSN:2297-055X
Publisher:Frontiers Media SA
Volume:10
Page Range:1071643
Date:14 February 2023
Official Publication:https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1071643
PubMed:View item in PubMed

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Open Access
MDC Library