Helmholtz Gemeinschaft

Search
Browse
Statistics
Feeds

Markers of myocardial damage predict mortality in patients with aortic stenosis

Item Type:Article
Title:Markers of myocardial damage predict mortality in patients with aortic stenosis
Creators Name:Kwak, S. and Everett, R.J. and Treibel, T.A. and Yang, S. and Hwang, D. and Ko, T. and Williams, M.C. and Bing, R. and Singh, T. and Joshi, S. and Lee, H. and Lee, W. and Kim, Y.J. and Chin, C.W.L. and Fukui, M. and Al Musa, T. and Rigolli, M. and Singh, A. and Tastet, L. and Dobson, L.E. and Wiesemann, S. and Ferreira, V.M. and Captur, G. and Lee, S. and Schulz-Menger, J. and Schelbert, E.B. and Clavel, M.A. and Park, S.J. and Rheude, T. and Hadamitzky, M. and Gerber, B.L. and Newby, D.E. and Myerson, S.G. and Pibarot, P. and Cavalcante, J.L. and McCann, G.P. and Greenwood, J.P. and Moon, J.C. and Dweck, M.R. and Lee, S.P.
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is increasingly used for risk stratification in aortic stenosis (AS). However, the relative prognostic power of CMR markers and their respective thresholds remains undefined. OBJECTIVES: Using machine learning, the study aimed to identify prognostically important CMR markers in AS and their thresholds of mortality. METHODS: Patients with severe AS undergoing AVR (n = 440, derivation; n = 359, validation cohort) were prospectively enrolled across 13 international sites (median 3.8 years’ follow-up). CMR was performed shortly before surgical or transcatheter AVR. A random survival forest model was built using 29 variables (13 CMR) with post-AVR death as the outcome. RESULTS: There were 52 deaths in the derivation cohort and 51 deaths in the validation cohort. The 4 most predictive CMR markers were extracellular volume fraction, late gadolinium enhancement, indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDVi), and right ventricular ejection fraction. Across the whole cohort and in asymptomatic patients, risk-adjusted predicted mortality increased strongly once extracellular volume fraction exceeded 27%, while late gadolinium enhancement >2% showed persistent high risk. Increased mortality was also observed with both large (LVEDVi >80 mL/m(2)) and small (LVEDVi ≤55 mL/m(2)) ventricles, and with high (>80%) and low (≤50%) right ventricular ejection fraction. The predictability was improved when these 4 markers were added to clinical factors (3-year C-index: 0.778 vs 0.739). The prognostic thresholds and risk stratification by CMR variables were reproduced in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning identified myocardial fibrosis and biventricular remodeling markers as the top predictors of survival in AS and highlighted their nonlinear association with mortality. These markers may have potential in optimizing the decision of AVR.
Keywords:Aortic Valve Stenosis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Random Survival Forest
Source:Journal of the American College of Cardiology
ISSN:0735-1097
Publisher:Elsevier
Volume:78
Number:6
Page Range:545-558
Date:10 August 2021
Official Publication:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.047
PubMed:View item in PubMed

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Open Access
MDC Library