Helmholtz Gemeinschaft

Search
Browse
Statistics
Feeds

Continuous diffusion spectrum computation for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the kidney tubule system

[img]
Preview
PDF (Original Article) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
3MB

Item Type:Article
Title:Continuous diffusion spectrum computation for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the kidney tubule system
Creators Name:Periquito, J.S. and Gladytz, T. and Millward, J.M. and Delgado, P.R. and Cantow, K. and Grosenick, D. and Hummel, L. and Anger, A. and Zhao, K. and Seeliger, E. and Pohlmann, A. and Waiczies, S. and Niendorf, T.
Abstract:BACKGROUND: The use of rigid multi-exponential models (with a priori predefined numbers of components) is common practice for diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) analysis of the kidney. This approach may not accurately reflect renal microstructure, as the data are forced to conform to the a priori assumptions of simplified models. This work examines the feasibility of less constrained, data-driven non-negative least squares (NNLS) continuum modelling for DWI of the kidney tubule system in simulations that include emulations of pathophysiological conditions. METHODS: Non-linear least squares (LS) fitting was used as reference for the simulations. For performance assessment, a threshold of 5% or 10% for the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of NNLS and LS results was used. As ground truth, a tri-exponential model using defined volume fractions and diffusion coefficients for each renal compartment (tubule system: D(tubules), f(tubules); renal tissue: D(tissue), f(tissue); renal blood: D(blood), f(blood);) was applied. The impact of: (I) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) =40–1,000, (II) number of b-values (n=10–50), (III) diffusion weighting (b-range(small)=0-800 up to b-range(large)=0-2,180 s/mm(2)), and (IV) fixation of the diffusion coefficients D(tissue) and D(blood) was examined. NNLS was evaluated for baseline and pathophysiological conditions, namely increased tubular volume fraction (ITV) and renal fibrosis (10%: grade I, mild) and 30% (grade II, moderate). RESULTS: NNLS showed the same high degree of reliability as the non-linear LS. MAPE of the tubular volume fraction (f(tubules)) decreased with increasing SNR. Increasing the number of b-values was beneficial for f(tubules) precision. Using the b-range(large) led to a decrease in MAPE(ftubules) compared to b-range(small). The use of a medium b-value range of b=0-1,380 s/mm(2) improved f(tubules) precision, and further bmax increases beyond this range yielded diminishing improvements. Fixing D(blood) and D(tissue) significantly reduced MAPE(ftubules) and provided near perfect distinction between baseline and ITV conditions. Without constraining the number of renal compartments in advance, NNLS was able to detect the (fourth) fibrotic compartment, to differentiate it from the other three diffusion components, and to distinguish between 10% vs. 30% fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates the feasibility of NNLS modelling for DWI of the kidney tubule system and shows its potential for examining diffusion compartments associated with renal pathophysiology including ITV fraction and different degrees of fibrosis.
Keywords:Kidney, Tubular Volume Fraction, MRI, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging, Non-Negative Least Squares (NNLS)
Source:Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
ISSN:2223-4292
Publisher:AME Publishing
Volume:11
Number:7
Page Range:3098-3119
Date:July 2021
Additional Information:Copyright©Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Official Publication:https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-1360
PubMed:View item in PubMed

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Open Access
MDC Library