Helmholtz Gemeinschaft


Less is more - estimation of the number of strides required to assess gait variability in spatially confined settings

PDF (Original Article) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
[img] Other (Supplementary Material)

Item Type:Article
Title:Less is more - estimation of the number of strides required to assess gait variability in spatially confined settings
Creators Name:Kroneberg, D. and Elshehabi, M. and Meyer, A.C. and Otte, K. and Doss, S. and Paul, F. and Nussbaum, S. and Berg, D. and Kühn, A.A. and Maetzler, W. and Schmitz-Hübsch, T.
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Gait variability is an established marker of gait function that can be assessed using sensor-based approaches. In clinical settings, spatial constraints and patient condition impede the execution of longer distance walks for the recording of gait parameters. Turning paradigms are often used to overcome these constraints and commercial gait analysis systems algorithmically exclude turns for gait parameters calculations. We investigated the effect of turns in sensor-based assessment of gait variability. METHODS: Continuous recordings from 31 patients with movement disorders (ataxia, essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease) and 162 healthy elderly (HE) performing level walks including 180° turns were obtained using an inertial sensor system. Accuracy of the manufacturer’s algorithm of turn-detection was verified by plotting stride time series. Strides before and after turn events were extracted and compared to respective average of all strides. Coefficient of variation (CoV) of stride length and stride time was calculated for entire set of strides, segments between turns and as cumulative values. Their variance and congruency was used to estimate the number of strides required to reliably assess the magnitude of stride variability. RESULTS: Non-detection of turns in 5.8% of HE lead to falsely increased CoV for these individuals. Even after exclusion of these, strides before/after turns tended to be spatially shorter and temporally longer in all groups, contributing to an increase of CoV at group level and widening of confidence margins with increasing numbers of strides. This could be attenuated by a more generous turn excision as an alternative approach. Correlation analyses revealed excellent consistency for CoVs after at most 20 strides in all groups. Respective stride counts were even lower in patients using a more generous turn excision. CONClUSION: Including turns to increase continuous walking distance in spatially confined settings does not necessarily improve the validity and reliability of gait variability measures. Specifically with gait pathology, perturbations of stride characteristics before/after algorithmically excised turns were observed that may increase gait variability with this paradigm. We conclude that shorter distance walks of around 15 strides suffice for reliable and valid recordings of gait variability in the groups studied here.
Keywords:Gait Variability, Gait Analysis, Turn Detection, Healthy Elderly, Movement Disorders
Source:Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Publisher:Frontiers Media SA
Page Range:435
Date:21 January 2019
Official Publication:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00435
PubMed:View item in PubMed

Repository Staff Only: item control page


Downloads per month over past year

Open Access
MDC Library