Helmholtz Gemeinschaft


Gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood

[img] PDF (Article) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
[img] PDF (Additional file) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Item Type:Article
Title:Gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood
Creators Name:Jost, K.L. and Bertulat, B. and Rapp, A. and Brero, A. and Hardt, T. and Domaing, P. and Gösele, C. and Schulz, H. and Hübner, N. and Cardoso, M.C.
Abstract:Background: Heterochromatin has been reported to be a major silencing compartment during development and differentiation. Prominent heterochromatin compartments are located at the nuclear periphery and inside the nucleus (e.g., pericentric heterochromatin). Whether the position of a gene in relation to some or all heterochromatin compartments matters remains a matter of debate, which we have addressed in this study. Answering this question demanded solving the technical challenges of 3D measurements and the large-scale morphological changes accompanying cellular differentiation. Results: Here, we investigated the proximity effects of the nuclear periphery and pericentric heterochromatin on gene expression and additionally considered the effect of neighboring genomic features on a gene's nuclear position. Using a well-established myogenic in vitro differentiation system and a differentiation-independent heterochromatin remodeling system dependent on ectopic MeCP2 expression, we first identified genes with statistically significant expression changes by transcriptional profiling. We identified nuclear gene positions by 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization followed by 3D distance measurements toward constitutive and facultative heterochromatin domains. Single-cell-based normalization enabled us to acquire morphologically unbiased data and we finally correlated changes in gene positioning to changes in transcriptional profiles. We found no significant correlation of gene silencing and proximity to constitutive heterochromatin and a rather unexpected inverse correlation of gene activity and position relative to facultative heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery. Conclusion: In summary, our data question the hypothesis of heterochromatin as a general silencing compartment. Nonetheless, compared to a simulated random distribution, we found that genes are not randomly located within the nucleus. An analysis of neighboring genomic context revealed that gene location within the nucleus is rather dependent on CpG islands, GC content, gene density, and short and long interspersed nuclear elements, collectively known as RIDGE (regions of increased gene expression) properties. Although genes do not move away/to the heterochromatin upon up-/down-regulation, genomic regions with RIDGE properties are generally excluded from peripheral heterochromatin. Hence, we suggest that individual gene activity does not influence gene positioning, but rather chromosomal context matters for sub-nuclear location.
Keywords:3D-FISH Measurements, Chromocenters, Genomic Context, Gene Position, Gene Silencing, Heterochromatin Proximity, MeCP2, Myogenesis, Nuclear Periphery, Transcriptional Profiling
Source:Epigenetics & Chromatin
Publisher:BioMed Central
Page Range:36
Date:17 September 2015
Official Publication:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-015-0025-5
PubMed:View item in PubMed

Repository Staff Only: item control page


Downloads per month over past year

Open Access
MDC Library