Helmholtz Gemeinschaft

Search
Browse
Statistics
Feeds

Reliability of intra-retinal layer thickness estimates

[img] PDF (Article) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
10MB
[img] Other (Supplementary Materials)
107kB

Item Type:Article
Title:Reliability of intra-retinal layer thickness estimates
Creators Name:Oberwahrenbrock, T. and Weinhold, M. and Mikolajczak, J. and Zimmermann, H. and Paul, F. and Beckers, I. and Brandt, A.U.
Abstract:PURPOSE:Measurement of intra-retinal layer thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become increasingly prominent in multiple sclerosis (MS) research.Nevertheless, the approaches used for determining the mean layer thicknesses vary greatly. Insufficient data exist on the reliability of different thickness estimates, which is crucial for their application in clinical studies. This study addresses this lack by evaluating the repeatability of different thickness estimates. METHODS: Studies that used intra-retinal layer segmentation of macular OCT scans in patients with MS were retrieved from PubMed. To investigate the repeatability of previously applied layer estimation approaches, we generated datasets of repeating measurements of 15 healthy subjects and 13 multiple sclerosis patients using two OCT devices (Cirrus HD-OCT and Spectralis SD-OCT). We calculated each thickness estimate in each repeated session and analyzed repeatability using intra-class correlation coefficients and coefficients of repeatability. RESULTS: We identified 27 articles, eleven of them used the Spectralis SD-OCT, nine Cirrus HD-OCT, two studies used both devices and two studies applied RTVue-100. Topcon OCT-1000, Stratus OCT and a research device were used in one study each. In the studies that used the Spectralis, ten different thickness estimates were identified, while thickness estimates of the Cirrus OCT were based on two different scan settings. In the simulation dataset, thickness estimates averaging larger areas showed an excellent repeatability for all retinal layers except the outer plexiform layer (OPL). CONCLUSIONS: Given the good reliability, the thickness estimate of the 6mm-diameter area around the fovea should be favored when OCT is used in clinical research. Assessment of the OPL was weak in general and needs further investigation before OPL thickness can be used as a reliable parameter.
Keywords:Fovea Centralis, Multiple Sclerosis, Nerve Fibers, Optical Coherence Tomography, Retina
Source:PLoS ONE
ISSN:1932-6203
Publisher:Public Library of Science (U.S.A.)
Volume:10
Number:9
Page Range:e0137316
Date:8 September 2015
Official Publication:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137316
PubMed:View item in PubMed

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Open Access
MDC Library